alchemical process and its stages

Slowly, in the course of the eighteenth century, alchemy perished in its own obscurity:

(a)

Its method of explanation“obscurum per obscurius, ignotum per ignotius” (the obscure by the more obscure, the unknown by the more unknown)was incompatible with the spirit of enlightenment and particularly with the dawning of the science of chemistry towards the end of the century. But these two new intellectual forces only gave the coup de grâce to alchemy

CW12 ¶ 332

ALCHEMY'S INNER DECAY

(b)

Alchemy's inner decay had begun at least a century earlier, in the time of Jakob Böhme, when many alchemists deserted their alembics and melting-pots and devoted themselves entirely to (Hermetic) philosophy. It was then that the chemist and the Hermetic philosopher parted company. Chemistry became natural science, whereas Hermetic philosophy lost the empirical ground from under its feet and aspired to bombastic allegories and inane speculations which were only kept alive by memories of a better time. This was a time when the mind of the alchemist was really grappling with the problems of matter, when the exploring consciousness was confronted by the dark void of the unknown, in which figures and laws were dimly perceived and attributed to matter although they really belonged to the psyche

CW12 ¶ 332

INVESTIGATOR'S OWN PSYCHIC BACKGROUND

IS MIRRORED IN THE DARKNESS

(c)

Everything unknown and empty is filled with psychological projection; it is as if the investigator's own psychic background were mirrored in the darkness. What he sees in matter, or thinks he can see, is chiefly the data of his own unconscious which he is projecting into it. In other words, he encounters in matter, as apparently belonging to it, certain qualities and potential meanings of whose psychic nature he is entirely unconscious. This is particularly true of classical alchemy, where empirical science and mystical philosophy were more or less undifferentiated

CW12 ¶ 332

ALCHEMY DESCRIBES A PROCESS OF

CHEMICAL TRANSFORMATION

(d)

Alchemy, as is well known, describes a process of chemical transformation and gives numberless directions for its accomplishment. Although hardly two authors are of the same opinion regarding the exact course of the process and the sequence of its stages, the majority are agreed on the principal points at issue, and moreover from the earliest times, i.e., since the beginning of the Christian era

CW12 ¶ 333

FOUR STAGES ARE DISTINGUISHED BY COLOURS

(e)

Four stages are distinguished (fig. 114) , characterized by the original colours mentioned in Heraclitus:

CW12 ¶ 333
(e)

Four stages of the alchemical process

(e)

The four elements are indicated on the balls.Mylius, Philosophia reformata, (1622)

(e-1)

Melanosis (blackening)

CW12 ¶ 333
(e-2)

Leukosis (whitening)

CW12 ¶ 333
(e-3)

Xanthosis (yellowing)

CW12 ¶ 333
(e-4)

Iosis (reddening)

CW12 ¶ 333
(e-5)

This division of the process into four was called the,the quartering of the philosophy. Later, about the fifteenth or sixteenth century, the colours were reduced to three, and the xanthosis, otherwise called the citrinitas, gradually fell into disuse or was but seldom mentioned. Instead, the viriditas sometimes appears after the melanosis or nigredo in exceptional cases, though it was never generally recognized

CW12 ¶ 333

CLASSIFICATION OF ALCHEMICAL STAGES

(f)

Whereas the original tetrameria was exactly equivalent to the quaternity of elements, it was now frequently stressed that although there were four elements (earth, water, fire, and air) and four qualities (hot, cold, dry, and moist), there were only three colours: black, white, and red. Since the process never led to the desired goal and since the individual parts of it were never carried out in any standardized manner, the change in the classification of its stages cannot be due to extraneous reasons but rather to the symbolical significance of the quaternity and the trinity; in other words, it is due to inner psychological reasons

CW12 ¶ 333

THE INITIAL STATE

(g)

The nigredo or blackness (fig. 115) is the initial state, either present from the beginning as a quality of the prima materia, the chaos or massa confusa, or else produced by the separation (solutio, separatio, divisio, putrefactio) of the elements. If the separated condition is assumed at the start, as sometimes happens, then a union of opposites is performed in the likeness of a union of male and female (called the coniugium, matrimonium, coniunctio, coitus) followed by the death of the product of the union (mortificatio, calcinatio, putrefactio) and a corresponding nigredo

CW12 ¶ 334
(g)

The nigredo: eclipse of Mercurius senex

(g)

Mercurius senex exhales the spiritus and anima. The raven is a nigredo symbol. Jamsthaler, Viatorium (1625). Color transcription by Adam McLean.

THE WHITENING STAGE

(h)

From this the washing (ablutio, baptisma) either leads direct to the whitening (albedo), or else the soul (anima) released at the “death” is reunited with the dead body and brings about its resurrection, or finally the “many colours” (omnes colores), or “peacock's tail” (cauda pavonis), lead to the one white colour that contains all colours

CW12 ¶ 334

FIRST MAIN GOAL OF THE PROCESS

(i)

At this point the first main goal of the process is reached, namely the albedo, tinctura alba, terra alba foliata, lapis albus, etc., highly prized by many alchemists as if it were the ultimate goal. It is the silver or moon condition, which still has to be raised to the sun condition. The albedo is, so to speak, the daybreak, but not till the rubedo is it sunrise. The transition to the rubedo is formed by the citrinitas, though this, as we have said, was omitted later. The rubedo then follows direct from the albedo as the result of raising the heat of the fire to its highest intensity. The red and the white are King and Queen, who may also celebrate their “chymical nuptials” at this stage (fig. 116)

CW12 ¶ 334
(i)

Crowned hermaphrodite representing the union of king and queen

(i)

King and Queen stand between the sun and moon trees.“Traité d'alchimie” (MS., Paris, 17th cent.)